- The original band of fits, on course « third Cousin », consisted of an individual fits, Anthea Ring. She was already my second most readily useful matches at the FTDNA and you can my best match in the GEDmatch, in both cases disregarding romantic cousins to own whose testing I got paid off me. Having Anthea, AncestryDNA claims « You’ll be able to range: third – 4th cousins » and you can « Confidence: Quite high »; FTDNA states « 2nd Cousin – 4th Relative » and you may GEDmatch provides Gen=step three.4 (Full cM 133.3) to own my personal FTDNA system but Gen=3.6 (Complete cM 98.9) to have my AncestryDNA equipment.
- The next gang of suits, oriented « next Relative » contains 55 fits, all labelled « Possible variety: fourth – 6th cousins ». Toward ideal 13, Depend on try Extremely high; with the almost every other 42, Believe is actually High.
- The third band of matches, lead « Distant Relative » contained the remaining 2991 1st fits, most of the which have: Possible range: fifth – 8th cousins The first 143 got Confidence: Highest. The remainder got things like Depend on: An excellent and you can Trust: Reasonable.
1824 and you can ABT 1902. The truth that the brand new projected beginning years try shown inconsistently implies that they’re totally overlooked of the processes hence stimulates the brand new hints.
One example hinted you to one or two female with the exact same surname you’ll end up being sisters even with their projected beginning decades are certainly shown while the Abt
5 centimorgans mutual across the step one DNA sector) among several siblings who will be 19th, 28th, 29th and you may 30th back at my FTDNA record, where they are projected third-5th cousins. Continue Reading AncestryDNA’s very-entitled « Shared Predecessor Suggestions » usually are over junk that simply cannot even be ignored