The fresh new Crown need to call all of the their facts about Top instance and should not separated its case by getting in touch with proof within the reply in which it may provides expected the evidence are entitled by defence: Shaw v Roentgen (1952) 85 CLR 365. The newest Crown can be permitted to reopen their case managed to enhance a lack in situation that has been overlooked otherwise is simply tech: Wasow v Roentgen (unrep, 27/6/85, NSWCCA). This may exist any time given it will not results inside the unfairness: Pham v R NSWCCA 194 (adopting the Crown had come to address); Morris v Roentgen NSWCCA 152 on .
In which there can be several accused cross-test takes place in the order where implicated was named from the indictment unless counsel arrive at more arrangement.
Opinions
It’s usual to help you appoint a beneficial “shower” being an individual who will suggest certain areas of the scene for the jury according to the facts. This is often the police administrator in charge of the analysis. The brand new implicated shouldn’t have to be there at the examine however, they have the right to sit in: Jamal v Roentgen NSWCCA 198 in the . They often occurs the accused chooses never to on account of brand new prejudicial effect in the event the accused is within custody.
It’s advocated your police have to grab a movies tape of see so that it can later be tendered in the proof. This new tape will likely be generated whilst to not ever divulge professionals of your jury, but in order to number what is actually said of the bath and you will, whenever possible questions asked because of the jury and solutions provided by the new shower.
Transcript
The newest jury tends to be given new transcript or element of it, plus address contact information and you may, in the event the offered, new summing-up otherwise element of they: s 55C Jury Operate: Roentgen v Ronald Edward Medich (Zero 24) NSWSC 293. Continue Reading About what techniques in respect out of doing a standpoint, find [4-335]ff